Discussion
is an essential part of research where you interpret your finding and result more
deeply by relating them with existing literature.
In
the discussion part, the researcher explains, evaluates, and evaluates
their results. They elaborate on the relevance of the results and connect
the entire discussion to your research questions.
In how many parts does the discussion is divided into research?
The
discussion is based on six parts or we can simply say there are six major rules
which are used to write an effective discussion for research. Let’s elaborate on
them a bit more.
1. limitations of your research
It
must you define the limits of your research because through the discussion of
your research the reader can see that you have given serious attention to the
topics that your study does and does not contain, your credibility as a writer
or researcher can be strengthened by elaborating the limitations of your
research.
2. Restatement or restate:
Restatement
is also called restate in research and it is a significant part of your
research in a discussion method it explains the significance of the study by
drawing the reader's attention to the connections it has to other sources of
information, such as previous research or a facet of the industry that will be
altered as a result of the investigation.
3. Define unpredicted result:
It
includes the findings and offers an explanation that makes sense for why they
might have occurred in the first place. In addition, if an unexpected outcome
is essential to the research topic, you need to make sure that you explain how
the two are connected.
4. Outcomes/Findings:
It
is a summarization of your research’s findings, and it connects to finding out the
answer to research questions(s).
5. Context:
This
step examines your literature review that how the results fit in with the
research that has been executed in the past.
6. Investigates research studies:
This
section suggests a few areas in which additional research would be necessary. However,
going through the enormous suggestions may lead the reader to focus more on the
omissions in the article than the actual findings that were presented.
What should we skip in a discussion section?
Some
points you should skip in a discussion in research.
1.
Do not include new information
2.
Do not conclude with any support of your literature related to your study.
3.
Do not rephrase or rewrite the finding or result segment.
4.
Don't pick and choose which results to consider when evaluating them.
How to interpret the data in the discussion section of the research?
It
is obvious that the relevance of the results is not hidden to you,
but it is critical thing that you elaborate on their meaning for the
reader and demonstrate to them how the data specifically address the
research questions that you have set in your study.
Approaches of interpretation in the discussion section of research:
Here
are some important approaches which are necessary to elucidate.
1.
Providing an explanation for unexpected results and appraising the importance
of those findings
2.
Placing your findings within the context of past research and theoretical
frameworks
3.
Taking into consideration the various possible interpretations, and
developing an argument to support your perspective
4.
Analysis of whether or not the findings confirmed your assumptions or whether
or not they were in line with your objectives
0 Comments